There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh, that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. Romans 8:1-4
Self-gratification looks for pleasure and escape in things
like food, sex, drugs and alcohol; or, money, possessions and power. Consciously or unconsciously, we even view people
as a means to an end; when they stop meeting our needs, they are disposable. If
you no longer make me happy, if I think of you as too much trouble, I won’t
want you around. The focus is always on ourselves. Even when we think we have shifted the focus
toward making someone else happy, if that person doesn’t cooperate we become
upset because, underneath, our real motivation was self-gratification.
We evaluate everyone and everything on the basis of our own
happiness; Happiness is King. We view
the pursuit of it as our inalienable right and have even put that in the U.S.
Constitution!
By self-glorification I am referring to our need for
recognition, adulation, validation, etc.
This desire is a driving force behind everything we do. We often applaud it in ourselves and others
and give it names like ambition, responsibility, commitment, drive, focus,
determination. We admire and encourage
the aspiration to ‘be the best’. We view
it as character building. In the process
of striving to be the best we reason that we can learn to be gracious losers as
well as gracious winners. However,
because the driving force is self-glorification, the goal is inevitably to be’
better than’, which necessitates others being ‘lesser than’, and involves
competing, comparing, judging and ultimately condemning someone to the ‘lesser
than’ status. This need for self-glorification thrives on someone being ‘lesser
than.’ We love having someone to look
down on.
I come from a line of drinkers, so I will use that as my
illustration. The person who doesn’t
drink looks down on the person who does drink; the person who does drink looks
down on the person who drinks too much; the person who drinks too much looks
down on the person who drinks too much and can’t function; the person who
drinks too much and can’t function looks down on the person who drinks too
much, can’t function and lives on the streets. I’m sure it goes on from there. We all do this in our own situations.
Self-glorification is always at someone else’s expense.
Self-salvation is closely related to
self-glorification. It is not specific
to salvation as in ‘being saved’, or ‘going to heaven’, although that is definitely
a part of what I am talking about.
However, self-salvation in general is about justifying our existence,
proving that we are worthy, demonstrating that we are good enough, showing that
we are deserving. Where
self-glorification is more about arrogance and pride, self-salvation is more
about the fear of not measuring up. Its
‘do more, try harder’ mentality comes from the need to earn recognition. The ways we attempt to do this are
endless. We try to be beautiful, smart,
funny, interesting, thin, super-employees and students, super-moms or dads,
super-religious or even super-bad. There
is a part of each of us that believes if someone else does not recognize us, we
do not exist.
Even In the context of Christianity we struggle with this intrinsic
need for self-salvation because it is the way everything else with which we are
familiar operates. We earn, we prove, we
demonstrate, we justify. That is what we
do. Anything else is foreign. And, that is my point.
In my recent blogs I
have frequently talked about what I have called Action/Consequence and
Death/Resurrection as the two ways of viewing the world. I settled on those names because, to me, they
best described the characteristics of the two world views; but the idea represented
by the names is not new or mine. What I
have called Action/Consequence, some have called human nature; in Romans 7,
Paul uses the term ‘sin’ in that context.
In Romans 8:5-17, he contrasts the ‘way of the flesh’ with the ‘way of
the Spirit’. I choose to use different names because those are so fraught with
other meanings. But why do I think this
idea of two world views is so important?
Why do I feel the need for names at all?
It seems to me, if we do not acknowledge this innate universal
way of viewing and relating to life, we will not understand it is something
over which we have no control. We will
want, instead, to blame our culture, our society, our government, our parents,
our churches and ourselves, for what is simply our natural state.
Once we understand that it is our natural state, we can stop
being constantly surprised that we, and everyone else, are the way we are. The world thinks in only one way,
characterized by self-gratification, self-glorification and self-salvation. If we see anything we believe is not
motivated by those things, we are wrong.
Even in ourselves. Even at our
best. We are all in the same boat.
The problem is, on our own we cannot reason our way to the
conclusion that we are all in the same boat. We are blind to our true condition. It has to be revealed to us. We have to be
given something with which to compare ourselves that would show us our need for
something different; so God gave us the Law.
Romans chapter 2 says that even those who weren’t given the
benefit of the Law have its requirements written on their hearts. “Look,” God said, “this is the standard. This is what I am like. Compare yourselves to it. There is no room for even a hint of
self-gratification or self-glorification.
This is what I demand and require from you and it is impossible for you
to do. I will require the impossible
from you until you recognize that you are not capable of giving it to me. Your efforts at self-salvation will never be
enough to satisfy my demands. You are helpless. And when you recognize that,
you will finally be ready to hear that you need to be rescued and that I already
have a plan.”
Only God can draw us and enable us to see that there is
something other than who we naturally are; and that this “other” is something
we can never be. Only Jesus could be the
“other”; so, God sent him to earth to be what we could not be, to do what was
impossible for us and to give us the credit.
Once God reveals this amazing truth to us, it is helpful to
have names to differentiate between our natural state and our rescued state. I have chosen to call them Action/Consequence--because
our natural way of viewing and relating to life is based on the foolish idea
that we deserve something for what we do—that the consequence of our actions
should be a reward; and Death/Resurrection--because we are rescued as a result
of Christ’s death and resurrection
and because we were completely dead,
and God resurrected us. We brought nothing to the table but our
messed up way of thinking and relating; we did nothing because we could do
nothing, so God did everything for us through his Son, Jesus Christ, who had to
pay the price for the consequences of our actions.
The names are only a tool for purposes of communication and
discussion, what is important is the concept behind them. Even in our rescued state, we still retain
our natural way of viewing and relating to life. It is still our default way of
thinking. When we were rescued, it was
not removed. Every day we must be
reminded that there is another option, a foreign way to view and relate to the
people and circumstances in our lives; a way that is based solely on our
continued acknowledgment that we are all in the same boat and are helplessly
and utterly dependent on the grace of God alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment