For sin shall
not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace” Romans 6:14 (Emphasis mine)
In my most recent blog, TooMuch Grace?, I discussed the fact
that what puts us in danger of leading ungodly lives is not hearing too
much about grace, but hearing too much about law without grace. Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones once said, “If your
preaching of the gospel of God's free grace in Jesus Christ does not provoke
the charge from some of antinomianism, you're not preaching the gospel of the
free grace of God in Jesus Christ.”
“Antinomianism” comes from the Greek word meaning “lawless”, and
biblically speaking, it refers to someone who advocates the position that because
we are saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, we are free to
sin. Some took it further and claimed
that we actually honor God by demonstrating this freedom, because our
sinfulness shows off God’s goodness. What Lloyd-Jones meant is, preaching of
the true gospel of grace sounds enough like this perversion called
Antinomianism that the two will sometimes be confused.
This charge was leveled against Paul because he was
preaching the gospel of free grace in Jesus Christ, and it obviously got under
his skin. In Romans 3:7-8 Paul says,
“Someone might argue, ‘If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so
increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?’ Why not say—as we
are being slanderously reported as saying and as some claim that we say—‘Let us
do evil that good may result’? Their
condemnation is deserved.”
After his great treatise on grace presented in Romans 1-5, Paul
begins chapter 6 with the question he knows his detractors will level at him,
“What shall we say then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may
increase?” And his answer was, “By no
means!” Again, as he concludes a section
in that same chapter with verse 14, “For sin shall not be your master, because
you are not under law, but under grace” he feels the need to follow with verse
15, “What then? Shall we sin because we
are not under law but under grace?” followed once more by his exclamation, “By
no means!”
I have recounted earlier that when I wanted to know once and
for all if the gospel of grace was true, I locked myself away with just the
Book of Romans and the Holy Spirit and wrestled until I knew that it was the
truth of scripture. It was not an easy process. My experience
was, I would read the first five chapters and my heart would thrill with the
glorious news of the gospel. Then, I
would hit chapter 6 and my heart would freeze with fear.
As I have said before, we will initially view everything, including scripture, through the lens of Action/Consequence*and, through
that lens, this chapter appeared to me to be in complete contradiction to the
very foundation Paul had so carefully laid down in chapters 1-5, which was that
now, a righteousness from God, apart from law, had been made known, and this
righteousness comes through faith in Jesus Christ, to all who believe. To me, chapter 6 seemed to be saying that,
as a believer, I should now be living without sin because of all that Jesus had
done for me. My legalistic upbringing
had led me to fear this was the case, and this very issue was the reason I was so
desperately searching to understand the truth.
Did my salvation depend on me and my actions, or did it depend solely on
the grace of Jesus Christ?
I reasoned with myself, that Romans chapter 6 was written by the
same author who wrote the first five chapters, and that Paul would not suddenly completely contradict himself; and
concluded that, either I was confused about the first five chapters, or I misunderstood
chapter 6. I read that chapter over and
over until I was in utter despair; then I would run back and reread chapters
1-5, to find comfort and peace again.
I can’t say how long this process repeated itself, but I
know it seemed like a very long time. Blessedly, even during that process, I felt
the Spirit assuring me that I was close to finding the answer. I began to feel an
increasing sense that what I was searching for was right in front of me, but I
just couldn’t see it.
The verses I zeroed in on were Romans 6:1-12. I’m going to quote the whole passage here in
case you don’t have a Bible handy, “What shall we say, then? Shall we go on
sinning so that grace may increase? By no means! We died to sin; how can we
live in it any longer? Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into
Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were therefore buried with him
through baptism into death that, just as Christ was raised from the dead
through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. If we have been
united with him like this in his death, we will certainly also be united with
him in his resurrection. For we know that our old self was crucified with him
so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be
slaves to sin—because anyone who has died has been freed from sin. Now, if we died with Christ we believe that
we will also live with him. For we know
that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no
longer has mastery over him. The death
he died, he died to sin once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to
God. In the same way, count yourselves
dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus. Therefore, do not let sin reign
in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires.”
Once I had interpreted those verses from the viewpoint of
Action/Consequence, the rest of chapter seemed to fall in line and led straight to
hopelessness, as far as I was concerned.
Yet, I felt these were the verses that held the key. I prayed and prayed for God to show me the
truth, even if it was not what I hoped against hope it would be.
Finally, I was compelled to do something I had never done before. I
actually felt silly, but I got a piece of paper and a pen and drew a picture of
what those verses were saying; a sort of diagram. I’m not an artist, so the picture was done
with stick figures, much like a child would draw. On the far left-hand side of the page I drew
a stick figure of me and above me a crude drawing of the tablets of stone, representing
the law. Underneath them I wrote “condemnation” with an arrow pointing to my
head. Then, on the far right-hand side
of the paper, I drew a big circle and inside it I wrote “God”. Then, in the middle, I drew the cross and on
the cross I drew another circle. Inside
the circle I wrote “Jesus” at the top and “Me” underneath. Then I drew an arrow from the stick figure of
me on the left side of the page, going under the cross, and coming up on the
side where God was. I looked at the
picture for a few minutes, and then I knew.
The picture showed the Death/Resurrection* meaning of the
scripture: In Christ, I had died on the
cross in payment for my sins, I had been buried with him, and then I had been
raised with him on the right-hand side of the page, with God. The law, with its condemnation, was still on
the left hand side, separated from me, now, by the cross. Because I had died (in Christ), my sins had
all been paid for by that death and the law could never have one word of
condemnation to say to me again. There was nothing left with which to threaten me. I had already died; I could not die again!
Because I was resurrected, I stood on God’s side of the page with my debt completely satisfied. As far as God was concerned, I was now living a life without sin, because all of my sins were erased. I was freed from sin! Paul said I should “count” myself dead to sin, but alive to God.
Because I was resurrected, I stood on God’s side of the page with my debt completely satisfied. As far as God was concerned, I was now living a life without sin, because all of my sins were erased. I was freed from sin! Paul said I should “count” myself dead to sin, but alive to God.
I realized that, In this chapter Paul is simply answering the ridiculous
charge of teaching people to
offer themselves as slaves to sin in order to bring glory to God. I could see that my resurrected self was now standing with God, knowing that no sin could ever be charged against
me again, and how insane it would be for me to want to offer myself as an instrument of wickedness!
If I don't have to be good, why would I want to? Precisely because I don't have to! I understood then that the answer to my question of whether my salvation depended on me and my actions, or solely on the grace of Christ, was unequivically on the grace of Christ; and I also knew that I wanted to live my life in the service of that grace. In the more than thirty years since that day, that desire has never waned! I will never live it perfectly, but that's all right; I am simply offering myself to God as one who has been brought from death to life.
*For a more detailed understanding of Action/Consequence versus Death/Resurrection, please read my previous blog, Which Lens.
If I don't have to be good, why would I want to? Precisely because I don't have to! I understood then that the answer to my question of whether my salvation depended on me and my actions, or solely on the grace of Christ, was unequivically on the grace of Christ; and I also knew that I wanted to live my life in the service of that grace. In the more than thirty years since that day, that desire has never waned! I will never live it perfectly, but that's all right; I am simply offering myself to God as one who has been brought from death to life.
*For a more detailed understanding of Action/Consequence versus Death/Resurrection, please read my previous blog, Which Lens.
No comments:
Post a Comment